What should I bid? (April 2022)
The best submission for April came from Gordon Kellerman. He wins a voucher of $30 funded by TBIB, toward any purchase made at the Bridge Shop or Paul Lavings Bridgegear.
Nil Vul
N Dealer |
♠ 5 2 ♥ K 10 5 4 ♦ Q J 6 2 ♣ K Q J |
|
♠ A K 4 ♥ 3 ♦ A K 10 3 ♣ 9 8 7 6 3 |
♠ 9 7 6 ♥ Q 8 7 2 ♦ 9 8 5 ♣ A 4 2 |
|
♠ Q J 10 8 3 ♥ A J 9 6 ♦ 7 4 ♣ 10 5 |
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
1♦ | Pass | 1♠ | |
Pass | 1NT | Pass | 2♥ |
Pass | 3♥ | All Pass |
Playing Standard American the bidding was as shown with West leading a top diamond. The contract went 1 off. North maintained that South’s 2♥ bid was forcing. South was convinced that it was not as he hadn’t jumped to 3♥ and that North’s hand was limited to 14 HCPs at most. South is now showing 5 spades and at least 4 hearts but not game going values. What do you think?
Hi Gordon,
Technically 2♥ is not forcing as it is just a suggestion of contract (between 2♥ or 2♠ only) showing 5+♠ 4+♥. If South had jumped to 3♥, then that would show 12+points and game forcing hand. This means you are a bit stuck when you have an invitational hand.
What you’ll need to do is to take up a convention (sometimes called “Checkback” or “New Minor Forcing” or “2-way New Minor Forcing”) as this will immensely help your auctions after a 1NT rebid to show an invitational hand or better. Usually the 2♣ or the 2♦ bid over the 1NT would be the artificial bid, thus in this auction if you rebid 2♥, you can both understand it as not forcing if playing some form of a Checkback convention.
This is definitely a tricky part about natural bidding as it does seem like the 2♥ rebid is a ‘new suit’ so therefore it is ‘forcing’ but it is actually an exception! Bridge can be weird sometimes.
Hope that helps,
Andy